![]() If you want to try fixed deposits and only have $1000, DBS FD is best to start with. Please take note that these rates may change at any time. We have chosen best fixed deposit with the highest rates in SGD and for fresh funds only. No need to spend another day to shop around for other sources. We’ve made it an easier and smarter way to find for the best-fixed deposit rate. Also, there are times where banks or financial companies give promotional gifts if certain deposit amount is met.īut, we know that you’ve come to this page since you are looking for the best-fixed deposit rate in Singapore. You have to watch out also for fixed deposit rate promotions, banks or financial companies may offer it based on a certain amount where you can earn higher interest rates. AmountĪside from longer tenure, the higher amount you deposit the higher interest you can earn. Also, you can take advantage of fixed deposit rates promotion where they offer a much higher interest rate for certain tenure. Banks or financial companies will reward those depositors who can commit for a longer time frame. The motion to remand the action to the state court is granted.When your goal is to earn more interest, you must consider staying your money for a longer period of time which is over 12 months where you can earn over 1% per annum. Therefore there is not complete compliance with the statute, and subject matter jurisdiction is lacking. For jurisdictional purposes it must be considered to include partners who lack the citizenship status required. It would appear to be a *527 logical extension of the rules of law referred to above that the Coudert partnership is not a party who can sue in a federal court under diversity jurisdiction. The question is what to do about the Coudert partnership, which consists of partners who are citizens of New York and partners who are not citizens of either a state of this country or of a foreign state. The precise problem in the present case is somewhat different. Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure § 3621 (1984). ![]() ![]() Therefore a suit by them could not give rise to diversity jurisdiction. If these partners were suing by themselves they would not fit within any of the categories referred to in the statute, since they are neither citizens of a state of the United States nor are they citizens or subjects of a foreign state. The status of the Coudert partners residing in France is that they are still citizens of the United States and are not citizens of France. If we were dealing with the situation where a partnership had partners who were citizens of New York and citizens of France, there would be diversity jurisdiction under subdivision (3) of the statute. Y.1981) Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Co. However the cases have held that, for the sake of applying the diversity jurisdiction statute, a partnership must be considered to be a citizen of any and all states and foreign countries of which its partners are citizens. If Coudert could be considered a citizen of New York there would be diversity jurisdiction. The statute provides for diversity jurisdiction where an action is between (1) citizens of different States (2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state (3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties. Defendant Ion is a resident and citizen of Australia defendant Sowden is a resident of the State of Georgia and a citizen of New Zealand. Defendant Easyfind is a Delaware Corporation. However, their residence in France results in the fact that they are not citizens of any state of the United States for the purposes of diversity jurisdiction. It has an office in Paris and a few of its partners reside in France. Most of its partners are citizens of New York. The motion is granted.Ĭoudert is a law firm based in New York City. Plaintiff Coudert Brothers moves to remand the action to the state court. removed this action to the federal court, alleging jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. Greenberg, Cantor & Reiss, New York City, Seth Price, Stokes, Shapiro, Fussell & Genberg, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants.ĭefendant Easyfind International, Inc. *526 Stephen Sayre Singer, New York City, for plaintiff. 525 (1985) COUDERT BROTHERS, a Partnership, Plaintiff,ĮASYFIND INTERNATIONAL, INC., Kenneth Mandeno Sowden, and Glen Ernest Ion, Defendants.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |